lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 13 Feb 2019 10:28:58 -0800
From:   Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>
To:     Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] soc: bcm: bcm2835-pm: Fix error paths of initialization.

Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com> writes:

> Hi Eric,
>
> Am 13.02.19 um 01:33 schrieb Eric Anholt:
>> The clock driver may probe after ours and so we need to pass the
>> -EPROBE_DEFER out.  Fix the other error path while we're here.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>
>> Fixes: 670c672608a1 ("soc: bcm: bcm2835-pm: Add support for power domains under a new binding.")
>> ---
>>  drivers/soc/bcm/bcm2835-power.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>>  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/bcm/bcm2835-power.c b/drivers/soc/bcm/bcm2835-power.c
>> index 4a1b99b773c0..11f9469423f7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/soc/bcm/bcm2835-power.c
>> +++ b/drivers/soc/bcm/bcm2835-power.c
>> @@ -485,7 +485,7 @@ static int bcm2835_power_pd_power_off(struct generic_pm_domain *domain)
>>  	}
>>  }
>>  
>> -static void
>> +static int
>>  bcm2835_init_power_domain(struct bcm2835_power *power,
>>  			  int pd_xlate_index, const char *name)
>>  {
>> @@ -493,6 +493,12 @@ bcm2835_init_power_domain(struct bcm2835_power *power,
>>  	struct bcm2835_power_domain *dom = &power->domains[pd_xlate_index];
>>  
>>  	dom->clk = devm_clk_get(dev->parent, name);
>> +	if (IS_ERR(dom->clk)) {
>> +		int ret = PTR_ERR(dom->clk);
>> +
>> +		if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER)
>> +			return ret;
> is it safe to proceed in the other error cases?
> Even it would be more consistent with clk_prepare_enable() to print an
> error here.

Yes, not all domains have a clk, so we want to ignore the other error.
And we shouldn't print for defers, generally.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (833 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists