[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190213184605.GA11537@ravnborg.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2019 19:46:05 +0100
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Cc: DRI Development <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@...r.at>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...el.com>,
Fabio Rafael da Rosa <fdr@...42.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] staging/vboxvideo: Add TODO
Hi Hans
> >
> >>Which bring me back to a question asked a week ago or so.
> >>What is missing before we can move vboxvideo out of staging/
> >
> >I think it boils down to someone needs to submit it and we'll take a look.
>
> Right, I have this on my TODO, but I did not manage to find time for this
> the past few weeks. I expect to have time for this in a couple of weeks
> from now, which means the move will miss the 5.1 merge window.
>
> Note you (Sam) are certainly welcome to submit a patch doing the move
> yourself, I can certainly use some help with maintaining vboxvideo.
I have not tried to submit patches to move vboxvideo out of staging.
Partially due to lack of time, mostly lack of competence to
follow-up on the review comments I hope we will see.
I am perfectly happy to do trivial stuff, but when someone ask
to replace the use of ttm with shmem+gem (example - I do not
know if this is a relevant comment), then it is above
me for the moment.
And on top of this then I lack a good testing environment.
I could do it but then anything difficult would just be added
to a TODO file, and then I dunno how useful it is.
Something to consider when we are past the merge window anyway.
Sam
Powered by blists - more mailing lists