[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5474F9B1-6E8F-4677-976B-C10103175B05@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2019 18:46:59 +0000
From: "Bae, Chang Seok" <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
"Metzger, Markus T" <markus.t.metzger@...el.com>,
"Shankar, Ravi V" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 08/13] x86/fsgsbase/64: Introduce the
FIND_PERCPU_BASE macro
> On Feb 2, 2019, at 09:17, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 12:55 PM Chang S. Bae <chang.seok.bae@...el.com> wrote:
>>
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * CPU/node NR is loaded from the limit (size) field of a special segment
>> + * descriptor entry in GDT.
>> + */
>> +.macro LOAD_CPU_AND_NODE_SEG_LIMIT reg:req
>> + movq $__CPUNODE_SEG, \reg
>> + lsl \reg, \reg
>> +.endm
>> +
>
> Please put the alternative in here instead of in FIND_PERCPU_BASE.
I would like to apply your comment though, build errors will come up due to the
__CPUNODE_SEG. So, still hoping the alternative line below is straightforward enough.
Will send out a revision, that reflects all other comments, shortly.
Chang
>
>> +/*
>> + * Fetch the per-CPU GSBASE value for this processor and put it in @reg.
>> + * We normally use %gs for accessing per-CPU data, but we are setting up
>> + * %gs here and obviously can not use %gs itself to access per-CPU data.
>> + */
>> +.macro FIND_PERCPU_BASE reg:req
>>
>> + ALTERNATIVE \
>> + "LOAD_CPU_AND_NODE_SEG_LIMIT \reg", \
>> + "RDPID \reg", \
>> + X86_FEATURE_RDPID
>> + andq $VDSO_CPUNODE_MASK, \reg
>> + movq __per_cpu_offset(, \reg, 8), \reg
>> +.endm
Powered by blists - more mailing lists