lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 12 Feb 2019 21:31:58 -0500
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.20 007/105] mfd: twl-core: Fix section annotations on {,un}protect_pm_master

From: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>

[ Upstream commit 8838555089f0345b87f4277fe5a8dd647dc65589 ]

When building the kernel with Clang, the following section mismatch
warning appears:

WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x3d84a3b): Section mismatch in reference from
the function twl_probe() to the function
.init.text:unprotect_pm_master()
The function twl_probe() references
the function __init unprotect_pm_master().
This is often because twl_probe lacks a __init
annotation or the annotation of unprotect_pm_master is wrong.

Remove the __init annotation on the *protect_pm_master functions so
there is no more mismatch.

Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/mfd/twl-core.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mfd/twl-core.c b/drivers/mfd/twl-core.c
index 4be3d239da9e..299016bc46d9 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/twl-core.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/twl-core.c
@@ -979,7 +979,7 @@ add_children(struct twl4030_platform_data *pdata, unsigned irq_base,
  * letting it generate the right frequencies for USB, MADC, and
  * other purposes.
  */
-static inline int __init protect_pm_master(void)
+static inline int protect_pm_master(void)
 {
 	int e = 0;
 
@@ -988,7 +988,7 @@ static inline int __init protect_pm_master(void)
 	return e;
 }
 
-static inline int __init unprotect_pm_master(void)
+static inline int unprotect_pm_master(void)
 {
 	int e = 0;
 
-- 
2.19.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists