linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -tip v3 05/10] kprobes: Search non-suffixed symbol in blacklist

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 13 Feb 2019 08:13:16 +0100
From:   Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:     Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, peterz@...radead.org,
        Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andrea Righi <righi.andrea@...il.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip v3 05/10] kprobes: Search non-suffixed symbol in
 blacklist


* Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org> wrote:

> Newer gcc can generate some different instances of a function
> with suffixed symbols if the function is optimized and only
> has a part of that. (e.g. .constprop, .part etc.)
> 
> In this case, it is not enough to check the entry of kprobe
> blacklist because it only records non-suffixed symbol address.
> 
> To fix this issue, search non-suffixed symbol in blacklist if
> given address is within a symbol which has a suffix.
> 
> Note that this can cause false positive cases if a kprobe-safe
> function is optimized to suffixed instance and has same name
> symbol which is blacklisted.
> But I would like to chose a fail-safe design for this issue.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>

Why did you not add Steven's Reviewed-by tag?

Thanks,

	Ingo