linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] qcom: ssbi-gpio: add support for hierarchical IRQ chip

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkdYHK1qwcy3AzRjwC1A_FB3ns9T7O_UnCgbtk30Nx=S8+A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 13 Feb 2019 09:38:23 +0100
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Brian Masney <masneyb@...tation.org>
Cc:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
        Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        Nicolas Dechesne <nicolas.dechesne@...aro.org>,
        Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@...aro.org>,
        David Brown <david.brown@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        "thierry.reding@...il.com" <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] qcom: ssbi-gpio: add support for hierarchical
 IRQ chip

On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 3:16 AM Brian Masney <masneyb@...tation.org> wrote:

> This patch series adds hierarchical IRQ chip support to ssbi-gpio so
> that device tree consumers can request an IRQ directly from the GPIO
> block rather than having to request an IRQ from the underlying PMIC.
>
> For more background information, see the email thread with Linus
> Walleij's excellent description of the problem at
> https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-gpio/msg34655.html.
>
> These changes were tested by Linus Walleij on an APQ8060 DragonBoard.
>
> See the notes on the individual patches for the changelog.

SInce we have definitive ACKs from the irqchip and
MFD maintainers I have queued this series on an immutable branch
that I will merge for v5.1 and offer to the MFD and ARM SoC
once it builds fine on the test servers.

I don't think the Qcom maintainers will complain.

Yours,
Linus Walleij