lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-c89d92eddfad11e912fb506f85e1796064a9f9d2@git.kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 13 Feb 2019 01:05:45 -0800
From:   tip-bot for Viresh Kumar <tipbot@...or.com>
To:     linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        hpa@...or.com, peterz@...radead.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
        viresh.kumar@...aro.org, mingo@...nel.org,
        vincent.guittot@...aro.org
Subject: [tip:sched/core] sched/fair: Use non-atomic
 cpumask_{set,clear}_cpu()

Commit-ID:  c89d92eddfad11e912fb506f85e1796064a9f9d2
Gitweb:     https://git.kernel.org/tip/c89d92eddfad11e912fb506f85e1796064a9f9d2
Author:     Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
AuthorDate: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 14:57:01 +0530
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitDate: Wed, 13 Feb 2019 08:34:13 +0100

sched/fair: Use non-atomic cpumask_{set,clear}_cpu()

The cpumasks updated here are not subject to concurrency and using
atomic bitops for them is pointless and expensive. Use the non-atomic
variants instead.

Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/2e2a10f84b9049a81eef94ed6d5989447c21e34a.1549963617.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c      | 6 +++---
 kernel/sched/isolation.c | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 8abd1c271499..8213ff6e365d 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -6097,7 +6097,7 @@ static int select_idle_core(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int
 		bool idle = true;
 
 		for_each_cpu(cpu, cpu_smt_mask(core)) {
-			cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, cpus);
+			__cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, cpus);
 			if (!available_idle_cpu(cpu))
 				idle = false;
 		}
@@ -9105,7 +9105,7 @@ more_balance:
 		if ((env.flags & LBF_DST_PINNED) && env.imbalance > 0) {
 
 			/* Prevent to re-select dst_cpu via env's CPUs */
-			cpumask_clear_cpu(env.dst_cpu, env.cpus);
+			__cpumask_clear_cpu(env.dst_cpu, env.cpus);
 
 			env.dst_rq	 = cpu_rq(env.new_dst_cpu);
 			env.dst_cpu	 = env.new_dst_cpu;
@@ -9132,7 +9132,7 @@ more_balance:
 
 		/* All tasks on this runqueue were pinned by CPU affinity */
 		if (unlikely(env.flags & LBF_ALL_PINNED)) {
-			cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu_of(busiest), cpus);
+			__cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu_of(busiest), cpus);
 			/*
 			 * Attempting to continue load balancing at the current
 			 * sched_domain level only makes sense if there are
diff --git a/kernel/sched/isolation.c b/kernel/sched/isolation.c
index 81faddba9e20..b02d148e7672 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/isolation.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/isolation.c
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ static int __init housekeeping_setup(char *str, enum hk_flags flags)
 		cpumask_andnot(housekeeping_mask,
 			       cpu_possible_mask, non_housekeeping_mask);
 		if (cpumask_empty(housekeeping_mask))
-			cpumask_set_cpu(smp_processor_id(), housekeeping_mask);
+			__cpumask_set_cpu(smp_processor_id(), housekeeping_mask);
 	} else {
 		cpumask_var_t tmp;
 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ