linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm: Fix the pgtable leak

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 13 Feb 2019 21:12:00 +0900
From:   Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
To:     Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Cc:     gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
        Liu Bo <bo.liu@...ux.alibaba.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Fix the pgtable leak

On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 01:03:30PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 13-02-19 20:29:00, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > [1] was backported to v4.9 stable tree but it introduces pgtable
> > memory leak because with fault retrial, preallocated pagetable
> > could be leaked in second iteration.
> > To fix the problem, this patch backport [2].
> > 
> > [1] 5cf3e5ff95876, mm, memcg: fix reclaim deadlock with writeback
> > [2] b0b9b3df27d10, mm: stop leaking PageTables
> > 
> > Fixes: 5cf3e5ff95876 ("mm, memcg: fix reclaim deadlock with writeback")
> > Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
> > Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
> > Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> > Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
> > Cc: Liu Bo <bo.liu@...ux.alibaba.com>
> > Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> [4.9]
> > Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
> 
> Thanks for catching this dependency. Do I assume it correctly that this
> is stable-4.9 only?

I have no idea how I could find it automatically that a stable patch of
linus tree is spread out with several stable trees(Hope Greg has an
answer). I just checked 4.4 longterm kernel and couldn't find it in there.

Thanks.