[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <acb7940e-df38-97a7-8500-4825fb0f6604@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2019 13:37:31 +0100
From: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, masonccyang@...c.com.tw
Cc: bbrezillon@...nel.org,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>, juliensu@...c.com.tw,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
zhengxunli@...c.com.tw
Subject: Re: Applied "spi: Add Renesas R-Car Gen3 RPC-IF SPI controller
driver" to the spi tree
On 2/13/19 1:16 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 04:25:32PM +0800, masonccyang@...c.com.tw wrote:
>
>> From current mainline branch, MFD seems support the device which is on
>> the same hardware bus(i.e, I2C, SPI, MMIO and SPMI)for multi-function
>> by Read/Write the common same registers.
>
> That's most MFDs but there are some that do some level of enumeration
> (even if it's just looking at the device ID that got registered) to
> decide what subdevices get registered, that's what people are suggesting
> here I think.
Right. Although I think some of the code could be shared between the SPI
and HF modes.
>> I am checking and not sure if MMIO of MFD could support RPC-IF for
>> different hardware bus on SPI and CFI.
>> I also doubt if this method is a correct solution for RPC-IF works
>> either in SPI mode or CFI mode.
>
> For MMIO devices MFD just passes through the parent resources.
>
--
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
Powered by blists - more mailing lists