linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/5] kasan, kmemleak: pass tagged pointers to kmemleak

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAAeHK+y7q7BGYCnCNe1PDd+9jcmn7+F5EWxZ_hS+Ae7a2SBuew@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 13 Feb 2019 14:07:28 +0100
From:   Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>
To:     Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>
Cc:     Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
        Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
        Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        kasan-dev <kasan-dev@...glegroups.com>,
        Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Qian Cai <cai@....pw>,
        Kostya Serebryany <kcc@...gle.com>,
        Evgeniy Stepanov <eugenis@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] kasan, kmemleak: pass tagged pointers to kmemleak

On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 4:57 PM Vincenzo Frascino
<vincenzo.frascino@....com> wrote:
>
> On 11/02/2019 21:59, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> > Right now we call kmemleak hooks before assigning tags to pointers in
> > KASAN hooks. As a result, when an objects gets allocated, kmemleak sees
> > a differently tagged pointer, compared to the one it sees when the object
> > gets freed. Fix it by calling KASAN hooks before kmemleak's ones.
> >
>
> Nit: Could you please add comments to the the code? It should prevent that the
> code gets refactored in future, reintroducing the same issue.

Sure, I'll send v2 with comments, thanks!

>
> > Reported-by: Qian Cai <cai@....pw>
> > Signed-off-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>
> > ---
> >  mm/slab.h        | 6 ++----
> >  mm/slab_common.c | 2 +-
> >  mm/slub.c        | 3 ++-
> >  3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/slab.h b/mm/slab.h
> > index 4190c24ef0e9..638ea1b25d39 100644
> > --- a/mm/slab.h
> > +++ b/mm/slab.h
> > @@ -437,11 +437,9 @@ static inline void slab_post_alloc_hook(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags,
> >
> >       flags &= gfp_allowed_mask;
> >       for (i = 0; i < size; i++) {
> > -             void *object = p[i];
> > -
> > -             kmemleak_alloc_recursive(object, s->object_size, 1,
> > +             p[i] = kasan_slab_alloc(s, p[i], flags);
> > +             kmemleak_alloc_recursive(p[i], s->object_size, 1,
> >                                        s->flags, flags);
> > -             p[i] = kasan_slab_alloc(s, object, flags);
> >       }
> >
> >       if (memcg_kmem_enabled())
> > diff --git a/mm/slab_common.c b/mm/slab_common.c
> > index 81732d05e74a..fe524c8d0246 100644
> > --- a/mm/slab_common.c
> > +++ b/mm/slab_common.c
> > @@ -1228,8 +1228,8 @@ void *kmalloc_order(size_t size, gfp_t flags, unsigned int order)
> >       flags |= __GFP_COMP;
> >       page = alloc_pages(flags, order);
> >       ret = page ? page_address(page) : NULL;
> > -     kmemleak_alloc(ret, size, 1, flags);
> >       ret = kasan_kmalloc_large(ret, size, flags);
> > +     kmemleak_alloc(ret, size, 1, flags);
> >       return ret;
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL(kmalloc_order);
> > diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> > index 1e3d0ec4e200..4a3d7686902f 100644
> > --- a/mm/slub.c
> > +++ b/mm/slub.c
> > @@ -1374,8 +1374,9 @@ static inline void dec_slabs_node(struct kmem_cache *s, int node,
> >   */
> >  static inline void *kmalloc_large_node_hook(void *ptr, size_t size, gfp_t flags)
> >  {
> > +     ptr = kasan_kmalloc_large(ptr, size, flags);
> >       kmemleak_alloc(ptr, size, 1, flags);
> > -     return kasan_kmalloc_large(ptr, size, flags);
> > +     return ptr;
> >  }
> >
> >  static __always_inline void kfree_hook(void *x)
> >
>
> --
> Regards,
> Vincenzo
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "kasan-dev" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to kasan-dev+unsubscribe@...glegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to kasan-dev@...glegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/kasan-dev/f57831be-c57a-4a9e-992e-1f193866467b%40arm.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.