lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 13 Feb 2019 14:36:24 +0100
From:   Greg KH <>
To:     Minchan Kim <>
Cc:     linux-mm <>, LKML <>,
        Johannes Weiner <>,
        "Kirill A . Shutemov" <>,
        Michal Hocko <>,
        Andrew Morton <>,
        Hugh Dickins <>,
        Liu Bo <>,
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Fix the pgtable leak

On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 08:29:00PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> [1] was backported to v4.9 stable tree but it introduces pgtable
> memory leak because with fault retrial, preallocated pagetable
> could be leaked in second iteration.
> To fix the problem, this patch backport [2].
> [1] 5cf3e5ff95876, mm, memcg: fix reclaim deadlock with writeback

This is really commit 63f3655f9501 ("mm, memcg: fix reclaim deadlock
with writeback") which was in 4.9.152, 4.14.94, 4.19.16, and 4.20.3 as
well as 5.0-rc2.

> [2] b0b9b3df27d10, mm: stop leaking PageTables

This commit was in 4.10, so I am guessing that this really is just a
backport of that commit?

If so, it's not the full backport, why not take the whole thing?  Why
only cherry-pick one chunk of it?  Why do we not need the other parts?


greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists