lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 14 Feb 2019 17:30:19 +0100
From:   Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:     Roman Gushchin <guroan@...il.com>
Cc:     Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, kernel-team@...com,
        cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/7] freezer for cgroup v2

On 02/12, Roman Gushchin wrote:
>
>   - handle properly the case, when a task is both stopped and frozen

I didn't read this version yet, just looked at

	+static void cgroup_update_frozen(struct cgroup *cgrp)
	+{
	+	bool frozen;
	+
	+	lockdep_assert_held(&css_set_lock);
	+
	+	/*
	+        * If the cgroup has to be frozen (CGRP_FREEZE bit set),
	+        * and all tasks are frozen and/or stopped, let's consider
	+        * the cgroup frozen. Otherwise it's not frozen.
	+        */
	+	frozen = test_bit(CGRP_FREEZE, &cgrp->flags) &&
	+               cgrp->freezer.nr_frozen_tasks +
	+	        cgrp->freezer.nr_stopped_tasks >=
	+	        cgrp->freezer.nr_tasks_to_freeze;

if this is the only change which should handle this case correctly, I doubt it can
help. See another email I sent you a minute ago...

Oleg.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ