[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c253c775-bc32-7cb4-e090-3f5764ea1285@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 17:42:05 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: lantianyu1986@...il.com
Cc: Lan Tianyu <Tianyu.Lan@...rosoft.com>, rkrcmar@...hat.com,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
sean.j.christopherson@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "KVM: Eliminate extra function calls in
kvm_get_dirty_log_protect()"
On 02/02/19 10:20, lantianyu1986@...il.com wrote:
> From: Lan Tianyu <Tianyu.Lan@...rosoft.com>
>
> The value of "dirty_bitmap[i]" is already check before setting its value
> to mask. The following check of "mask" is redundant. The check of "mask" was
> introduced by commit 58d2930f4ee3(("KVM: Eliminate extra function calls in
> kvm_get_dirty_log_protect()"). This patch is to revert the patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lan Tianyu <Tianyu.Lan@...rosoft.com>
> ---
> virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 8 +++-----
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> index 2bdc827b9ee9..ef06cfb9b52b 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> @@ -1200,11 +1200,9 @@ int kvm_get_dirty_log_protect(struct kvm *kvm,
> mask = xchg(&dirty_bitmap[i], 0);
> dirty_bitmap_buffer[i] = mask;
>
> - if (mask) {
> - offset = i * BITS_PER_LONG;
> - kvm_arch_mmu_enable_log_dirty_pt_masked(kvm, memslot,
> - offset, mask);
> - }
> + offset = i * BITS_PER_LONG;
> + kvm_arch_mmu_enable_log_dirty_pt_masked(kvm, memslot,
> + offset, mask);
> }
> spin_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> }
>
Queued, thanks.
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists