[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5C659C6F.5010000@ti.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 18:50:55 +0200
From: Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>
To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>, Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>,
"Davis, Andrew" <afd@...com>, Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@...com>
CC: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
ext Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>,
"Nori, Sekhar" <nsekhar@...com>, Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>,
<nsaulnier@...com>, <jreeder@...com>,
Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@...com>,
<woods.technical@...il.com>,
Linux-OMAP <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/14] dt-bindings: remoteproc: Add TI PRUSS bindings
On 14/02/19 17:51, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 14/02/2019 15:44, Roger Quadros wrote:
>> On 14/02/19 14:52, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>>> On Thu, 14 Feb 2019 10:55:10 +0000,
>>> Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 14/02/19 10:37, Linus Walleij wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 4:13 AM Suman Anna <s-anna@...com> wrote:
>>>>>> [Me]
>>>>>
>>>>>>> To be able to use hierarchical interrupt domain in the kernel, the top
>>>>>>> interrupt controller must use the hierarchical (v2) irqdomain, so
>>>>>>> if this is anything else than the ARM GIC it will be an interesting
>>>>>>> undertaking to handle this.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> These are interrupt lines coming towards the host processor running
>>>>>> Linux and are directly connected to the ARM GIC. This INTC module is
>>>>>> actually an PRUSS internal interrupt controller that can take in 64 (on
>>>>>> most SoCs) external events/interrupt sources and multiplexing them
>>>>>> through two layers of many-to-one events-to-intr channels &
>>>>>> intr-channels-to-host interrupts. Couple of the host interrupts go to
>>>>>> the PRU cores themselves while the remaining ones come out of the IP to
>>>>>> connect to other GICs in the SoC.
>>>>>
>>>>> If the muxing is static (like set up once at probe) so that while
>>>>> the system is running, there is one and one only event mapped to
>>>>> the GIC from the component below it, then it is hierarchical.
>>>>
>>>> This is how it looks.
>>>>
>>>> [GIC]<---8---[INTC]<---64---[events from peripherals]
>>>>
>>>> The 8 interrupt lines from INTC to the GIC are 1:1 mapped and fixed
>>>> per SoC. The muxing between 64 inputs to INTC and its 8 outputs are
>>>> programmable and might not necessarily be static per boot/probe as
>>>> it depends on what firmware is loaded on the PRU.
>>>
>>> But the point is that at any given time, there are at most 8 out of 64
>>> inputs that are used, right? You *never* end-up with two (or more) of
>>> these "events" being multiplexed on a single output line.
>>>
>>
>> Since the INTC's internal logic allows assigning more than one event each outputs,
>> at most all 64 events can be assigned to one output or distributed among the 8 outputs.
>
> OK. Do you get individual masking and status bits for each input?
Yes, we have individual enable/disable and status bits for each of the 64 events.
In addition to that it is possible to determine priority if multiple events come to the same
output by reading a register specific to that output.
--
cheers,
-roger
Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki.
Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists