lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190214171100.GA473@lst.de>
Date:   Thu, 14 Feb 2019 18:11:00 +0100
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     Takao Indoh <indou.takao@...itsu.com>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>,
        Takao Indoh <indou.takao@...fujitsu.com>, axboe@...com,
        sagi@...mberg.me, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme: Enable acceleration feature of A64FX processor

On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 09:03:58PM +0900, Takao Indoh wrote:
> Ok, let me think about how I should change this patch.

Just drop it.

> I'm thinking that the problem of this patch is adding processor specific
> code into NVMe common driver, is this correct? Or another problem? It
> would be great if you could give me a hint to improve this patch.

For one it is processor / root port specific.  But even more importantly
it is incorrect.  If the device wants to issue a relaxed order
transaction it should do so all by itself, not by hacking around it
from the kernel.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ