linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] irqchip/i8259: fix shutdown order by moving syscore

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190214184309.f3zklkhv55c4z4g6@pburton-laptop>
Date:   Thu, 14 Feb 2019 18:43:10 +0000
From:   Paul Burton <paul.burton@...s.com>
To:     Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
CC:     Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "tomli@...li.me" <tomli@...li.me>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
        James Hogan <jhogan@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] irqchip/i8259: fix shutdown order by moving syscore_ops
 registration

Hi Marc,

On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 10:43:06AM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Thu, 07 Feb 2019 20:58:12 +0000,
> Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi> wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 08:56:37AM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > > On 06/02/2019 21:26, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
> > > >  static void init_8259A(int auto_eoi)
> > > >  {
> > > >  	unsigned long flags;
> > > > @@ -332,6 +324,7 @@ struct irq_domain * __init __init_i8259_irqs(struct device_node *node)
> > > >  		panic("Failed to add i8259 IRQ domain");
> > > >  
> > > >  	setup_irq(I8259A_IRQ_BASE + PIC_CASCADE_IR, &irq2);
> > > > +	register_syscore_ops(&i8259_syscore_ops);
> > > >  	return domain;
> > > >  }
> > > >  
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Given that this is a change of behaviour that is likely to affect other
> > > platforms (I see at least another 6 MIPS machines using the i8259),
> > > could someone make sure that this doesn't cause any regression? This is
> > > unlikely to affect the SGI boxes, as they predate any notion of power
> > > management, but something like Malta could potentially be affected.
> > 
> > For shutdown, I don't think there are many syscore_ops users on these
> > platforms. Actually I could find only two that I think could be used:
> > 	- cpufreq (issue fixed by this patch, and Loongson is the only user
> > 	  anyway)
> > 	- leds-trigger
> > 
> > Then suspend/resume: i8259 doesn't implement suspend, so there is no
> > change in behaviour. In resume it does PIC re-init, but syscore_resume()
> > is done with interrupts disabled so the order shouldn't matter.
> 
> In the absence of any comment from the MIPS guys over the past week,
> I've queued this. Please let me know should it break anything.

Apologies for my sluggish response, but for what it's worth the patch
looks reasonable at a glance. Malta is the only other I8259-using
hardware that I technically have access to, but at this point Malta
isn't actively used & it's really seen more as "the board QEMU defaults
to" than a useful real hardware platform.

Thanks,
    Paul