[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <59479c08d4624ffdb00883813ce80729@ausx13mps321.AMER.DELL.COM>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 19:26:28 +0000
From: <Alex_Gagniuc@...lteam.com>
To: <lukas@...ner.de>
Cc: <mr.nuke.me@...il.com>, <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
<Austin.Bolen@...l.com>, <keith.busch@...el.com>,
<Shyam.Iyer@...l.com>, <gustavo@...eddedor.com>,
<linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: pciehp: Do not turn off slot if presence comes up
after link
On 2/14/19 1:01 AM, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 06:55:46PM +0000, Alex_Gagniuc@...lteam.com wrote:
>> On 2/13/19 2:36 AM, Lukas Wunner wrote:
>>>> (*) A bit hypothetical: There is no hardware yet implementing the ECN.
>>>
>>> Hm, this contradicts Austin Bolen's e-mail of Jan 25 that "Yes, this
>>> platform disables in-band presence" (when asked whether your host
>>> controller already adheres to the ECN).
>>
>> Both statements are true. The hardware does indeed disable in-band
>> presence, in a rudimentary way that is not compliant with the ECN -- it
>> doesn't implement the bits required by the ECN.
>
> Ugh, can a BIOS update make those machines compliant to the ECN
No, that is not possible, I'm told.
> or do we need a quirk specifically for them?
We might have to.
> It should match the spec, which I have no access to.
I am as irritated as you that the spec is not readily available for
public viewing.
Cheers,
Alex
Powered by blists - more mailing lists