linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] binder: create userspace-to-binder-buffer copy function

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJWu+oqq0s3x7j+gPzSRREj2gjZxzAPS_=XVM4uhC9GjSM9zfw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 14 Feb 2019 15:53:54 -0500
From:   Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>
To:     Todd Kjos <tkjos@...gle.com>
Cc:     Todd Kjos <tkjos@...roid.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>,
        "open list:ANDROID DRIVERS" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Martijn Coenen <maco@...gle.com>,
        "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
        Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@...roid.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] binder: create userspace-to-binder-buffer copy function

On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 3:42 PM Todd Kjos <tkjos@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 11:45 AM Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com> wrote:
[snip]
> > > + * check_buffer() - verify that buffer/offset is safe to access
> > > + * @alloc: binder_alloc for this proc
> > > + * @buffer: binder buffer to be accessed
> > > + * @offset: offset into @buffer data
> > > + * @bytes: bytes to access from offset
> > > + *
> > > + * Check that the @offset/@...es are within the size of the given
> > > + * @buffer and that the buffer is currently active and not freeable.
> > > + * Offsets must also be multiples of sizeof(u32). The kernel is
> >
> > In all callers of binder_alloc_copy_user_to_buffer, the alignment of offsets
> > is set to sizeof(void *). Then shouldn't this function check for sizeof(void *)
> > alignment instead of u32?
>
> But there are other callers of check_buffer() later in the series that
> don't require pointer-size alignment. u32 alignment is consistent with
> the alignment requirements of the binder driver before this change.
> The copy functions don't actually need to insist on alignment, but
> these binder buffer objects have always used u32 alignment which has
> been checked in the driver. If user code misaligned it, then errors
> are returned. The alignment checks are really to be consistent with
> previous binder driver behavior.

Got it, thanks.

 - Joel