linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 11/15] PCI: pci-epf-test: Use pci_epc_get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 14 Feb 2019 10:36:35 +0530
From:   Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
To:     Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
CC:     Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Gustavo Pimentel <gustavo.pimentel@...opsys.com>,
        Alan Douglas <adouglas@...ence.com>,
        Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>,
        Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
        Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
        Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@...e-electrons.com>,
        Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>,
        <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/15] PCI: pci-epf-test: Use pci_epc_get_features to get
 EPC features

Hi Lorenzo,

On 13/02/19 8:06 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 07:08:18PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>> Hi Lorenzo,
>>
>> On 12/02/19 8:37 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 12:11:44PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>>  static int pci_epf_test_bind(struct pci_epf *epf)
>>>>  {
>>>>  	int ret;
>>>>  	struct pci_epf_test *epf_test = epf_get_drvdata(epf);
>>>>  	struct pci_epf_header *header = epf->header;
>>>> +	const struct pci_epc_features *epc_features;
>>>> +	enum pci_barno test_reg_bar = BAR_0;
>>>>  	struct pci_epc *epc = epf->epc;
>>>>  	struct device *dev = &epf->dev;
>>>> +	bool linkup_notifier = false;
>>>> +	bool msix_capable = false;
>>>> +	bool msi_capable = true;
>>>>  
>>>>  	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!epc))
>>>>  		return -EINVAL;
>>>>  
>>>> -	if (epc->features & EPC_FEATURE_NO_LINKUP_NOTIFIER)
>>>> -		epf_test->linkup_notifier = false;
>>>> -	else
>>>> -		epf_test->linkup_notifier = true;
>>>> -
>>>> -	epf_test->msix_available = epc->features & EPC_FEATURE_MSIX_AVAILABLE;
>>>> +	epc_features = pci_epc_get_features(epc, epf->func_no);
>>>
>>> I think it would work out better if struct pci_epc_features was
>>> allocated in the caller (stack) and pci_epc_get_features() take a
>>> pointer parameter to it rather than the callee and the callee would just
>>> have to fill it out, this also removes data in the driver that is not
>>> really useful.
>>>
>>> Is there any other reason behind the current design choice ?
>>
>> Some drivers are used by multiple platforms each with different features. In
>> such cases it's cleaner to have separate epc_feature table for each platform.
>>
>> I think the driver should maintain some sort of data to even populate
>> pci_epc_features allocated by EP function driver.
> 
> You mean that every EP controller driver should keep a table of
> pci_epc_features (instead of a single instance) to be matched using DT
> compatible strings to detect the platform variations ?

Yes.

Thanks
Kishon