lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 14 Feb 2019 07:18:33 +0000
From:   Anson Huang <anson.huang@....com>
To:     Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
CC:     "robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
        "shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        "s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        "kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        "festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>,
        "mturquette@...libre.com" <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        "sboyd@...nel.org" <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@....com>,
        Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-clk@...r.kernel.org" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V4 1/2] arm64: dts: freescale: imx8qxp: add cpu opp table

Hi, Viresh

Best Regards!
Anson Huang

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Viresh Kumar [mailto:viresh.kumar@...aro.org]
> Sent: 2019年2月14日 15:13
> To: Anson Huang <anson.huang@....com>
> Cc: robh+dt@...nel.org; mark.rutland@....com; shawnguo@...nel.org;
> s.hauer@...gutronix.de; kernel@...gutronix.de; festevam@...il.com;
> mturquette@...libre.com; sboyd@...nel.org; Aisheng Dong
> <aisheng.dong@....com>; Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>;
> devicetree@...r.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org; linux-
> kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-clk@...r.kernel.org; dl-linux-imx <linux-
> imx@....com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] arm64: dts: freescale: imx8qxp: add cpu opp
> table
> 
> On 14-02-19, 01:54, Anson Huang wrote:
> > Add i.MX8QXP CPU opp table to support cpufreq.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@....com>
> > ---
> > No change since V3.
> > ---
> >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8qxp.dtsi | 25
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8qxp.dtsi
> > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8qxp.dtsi
> > index 4021f25..593e2db 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8qxp.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8qxp.dtsi
> > @@ -34,6 +34,10 @@
> >  			reg = <0x0 0x0>;
> >  			enable-method = "psci";
> >  			next-level-cache = <&A35_L2>;
> > +			clocks = <&clk IMX_A35_CLK>;
> > +			clock-latency = <61036>;
> 
> Who uses this value ? And why is it different from the one mentioned in the
> OPP table ?

Sorry, forgot to remove it. Will remove it in next version.

> 
> > +			#cooling-cells = <2>;
> 
> clocks and cooling-cells must be defined for all the CPUs.

OK.

> 
> > +			operating-points-v2 = <&a35_0_opp_table>;
> >  		};
> >
> >  		A35_1: cpu@1 {
> > @@ -42,6 +46,7 @@
> >  			reg = <0x0 0x1>;
> >  			enable-method = "psci";
> >  			next-level-cache = <&A35_L2>;
> > +			operating-points-v2 = <&a35_0_opp_table>;
> >  		};
> >
> >  		A35_2: cpu@2 {
> > @@ -50,6 +55,7 @@
> >  			reg = <0x0 0x2>;
> >  			enable-method = "psci";
> >  			next-level-cache = <&A35_L2>;
> > +			operating-points-v2 = <&a35_0_opp_table>;
> >  		};
> >
> >  		A35_3: cpu@3 {
> > @@ -58,6 +64,7 @@
> >  			reg = <0x0 0x3>;
> >  			enable-method = "psci";
> >  			next-level-cache = <&A35_L2>;
> > +			operating-points-v2 = <&a35_0_opp_table>;
> >  		};
> >
> >  		A35_L2: l2-cache0 {
> > @@ -65,6 +72,24 @@
> >  		};
> >  	};
> >
> > +	a35_0_opp_table: opp-table {
> > +		compatible = "operating-points-v2";
> > +		opp-shared;
> > +
> > +		opp-900000000 {
> > +			opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <900000000>;
> > +			opp-microvolt = <1000000>;
> > +			clock-latency-ns = <150000>;
> > +		};
> > +
> > +		opp-1200000000 {
> > +			opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1200000000>;
> > +			opp-microvolt = <1100000>;
> > +			clock-latency-ns = <150000>;
> > +			opp-suspend;
> 
> You want to go to a higher frequency on suspend ?

Yes, on most of i.MX SoCs, we always use highest frequency for suspend to reduce
the suspend/resume latency.

Thanks,
Anson.

> 
> > +		};
> > +	};
> > +
> >  	gic: interrupt-controller@...00000 {
> >  		compatible = "arm,gic-v3";
> >  		reg = <0x0 0x51a00000 0 0x10000>, /* GIC Dist */
> > --
> > 2.7.4
> 
> --
> viresh

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ