lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 14 Feb 2019 10:23:39 +0200
From:   Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>
To:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, mazziesaccount@...il.com,
        heikki.haikola@...rohmeurope.com, mikko.mutanen@...rohmeurope.com,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com, broonie@...nel.org,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, rafael@...nel.org,
        mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org,
        linus.walleij@...aro.org, bgolaszewski@...libre.com,
        sre@...nel.org, lgirdwood@...il.com, a.zummo@...ertech.it,
        alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com, wim@...ux-watchdog.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, bogdan-petru.chircu-mare@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 8/8] watchdog: bd70528: Initial support for ROHM
 BD70528 watchdog block

On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 08:18:49AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Feb 2019, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> 
> > On 2/13/19 5:37 AM, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
> > > Initial support for watchdog block included in ROHM BD70528
> > > power management IC.
> > > 
> > > Configurations for low power states are still to be checked.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>
> > > Acked-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
> > > ---
> > > 
> > > I maintained the ack from Guenter as only change is to use function
> > > exported by MFD instead of pointer to function provided by MFD. Please
> > > let me know if this is not Ok.
> > > 
> > 
> > NP. With functions exported by MFD, my choice would have been to handle
> > locking there as well with respective locking/unlocking functions exported.
> > But that is your call to make, not mine.
> 
> FWIW, I agree.

Allright. I'll do lock/unclock functions in MFD side and cook up v10 =)
Linus Walleij found something to fix from GPIO too :) Thanks guys.

Br,
	Matti Vaittinen

-- 
Matti Vaittinen, Linux device drivers
ROHM Semiconductors, Finland SWDC
Kiviharjunlenkki 1E
90220 OULU
FINLAND

~~~ "I don't think so," said Rene Descartes.  Just then, he vanished ~~~

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ