[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <bf858f26ef32eb7bd24c665755b3aee4bc58d0e4.1550103861.git.andreyknvl@google.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 01:25:47 +0100
From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>
To: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
kasan-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Qian Cai <cai@....pw>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>,
Kostya Serebryany <kcc@...gle.com>,
Evgeniy Stepanov <eugenis@...gle.com>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH] kasan, slub: fix more conflicts with CONFIG_SLAB_FREELIST_HARDENED
When CONFIG_KASAN_SW_TAGS is enabled, ptr_addr might be tagged.
Normally, this doesn't cause any issues, as both set_freepointer()
and get_freepointer() are called with a pointer with the same tag.
However, there are some issues with CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG code. For
example, when __free_slub() iterates over objects in a cache, it
passes untagged pointers to check_object(). check_object() in turns
calls get_freepointer() with an untagged pointer, which causes the
freepointer to be restored incorrectly.
Add kasan_reset_tag to freelist_ptr(). Also add a detailed comment.
Signed-off-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>
---
mm/slub.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index 80da3a40b74d..c80e6699357c 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -249,7 +249,18 @@ static inline void *freelist_ptr(const struct kmem_cache *s, void *ptr,
unsigned long ptr_addr)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_SLAB_FREELIST_HARDENED
- return (void *)((unsigned long)ptr ^ s->random ^ ptr_addr);
+ /*
+ * When CONFIG_KASAN_SW_TAGS is enabled, ptr_addr might be tagged.
+ * Normally, this doesn't cause any issues, as both set_freepointer()
+ * and get_freepointer() are called with a pointer with the same tag.
+ * However, there are some issues with CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG code. For
+ * example, when __free_slub() iterates over objects in a cache, it
+ * passes untagged pointers to check_object(). check_object() in turns
+ * calls get_freepointer() with an untagged pointer, which causes the
+ * freepointer to be restored incorrectly.
+ */
+ return (void *)((unsigned long)ptr ^ s->random ^
+ (unsigned long)kasan_reset_tag((void *)ptr_addr));
#else
return ptr;
#endif
--
2.20.1.791.gb4d0f1c61a-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists