[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6c2ee1d5-b06a-4182-e373-12c4113fa514@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 11:07:00 +0100
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
To: Yauhen Kharuzhy <jekhor@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] extcon: Intel Cherry Trail Whiskey Cove PMIC and
external charger tweaks
Hi,
On 14-02-19 00:00, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 10-02-19 21:36, Yauhen Kharuzhy wrote:
>> At implementation of charging support for Lenovo Yoga Book (Intel Cherry Trail
>> based with Whiskey Cove PMIC), two pitfalls were found:
>>
>> - for detection of charger type by PMIC, bit 6 in the CHGRCTRL1 register
>> should be set in 0 (and set to 1 for Host mode). Pick up its definition
>> and logic from from Intel code drop[1];
>>
>> - "#CHARGE ENABLE" signal of external charger (bq25892) in Yoga Book is
>> connected to one of PMIC outputs controlled by CHGDISCTRL register.
>> Enable charging at driver initialization. Pick up this from Lenovo's code
>> drop[2,3].
>>
>> Please keep in mind that I have no docs for Whiskey Cove PMIC, so this patches
>> are based on some kind of reverse engineering and suppositions, correct me if
>> this semantic is wrong for common case.
>>
>> [1]. https://github.com/01org/ProductionKernelQuilts/uefi/cht-m1stable/patches/0001-power_supply-intel-pmic-ccsm-driver.patch
>> [2]. https://github.com/jekhor/yogabook-linux-android-kernel/blob/b7aa015ab794b516da7b6cb76e5e2d427e3b8b0c/drivers/power/bq2589x_charger.c#L2257
>> [3]. https://github.com/01org/ProductionKernelQuilts/uefi/cht-m1stable/patches/EM-Charger-Disable-battery-charging-in-S3-and-enable.patch
>
> Thank you for these patches, besides your Lenovo Yoga Book I'm aware of
> only 2 other device models using the CHT Whiskey Cove PMIC, the GPD win
> and GPD pocket devices. These both work fine without the changes your
> patches introduce.
>
> I need to check if your changes do not cause regressions on these 2
> devices, which are used with Linux by quite a few people. I will try
> to make some time for testing this sometime next week.
>
> A kind request to the platform-x86 driver maintainers (hi Andy): Please
> do not apply these patches until I've been able to test they don't cause
> issues elsewhere.
Erm, I just realized these are note platform-x86 driver patches at all.
Anyways same request to the extcon maintainers, please do not apply this
until I've had a chance to test this (which I'm doing right now).
Regards,
Hans
Powered by blists - more mailing lists