[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <98E2D333-409A-47AF-886F-3E661BD1C4EE@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 03:55:50 -0700
From: William Kucharski <william.kucharski@...cle.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
"lsf-pc@...ts.linux-foundation.org"
<lsf-pc@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-raid <linux-raid@...r.kernel.org>,
"bpf@...r.kernel.org" <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
Subject: Re: [LSF/MM TOPIC] (again) THP for file systems
> On Feb 13, 2019, at 4:59 PM, Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> I believe the direction is clear. It needs people to do the work.
> We're critically short of reviewers. I got precious little review of
> the original XArray work, which made Andrew nervous and delayed its
> integration. Now I'm getting little review of the followup patches
> to lay the groundwork for filesystems to support larger page sizes.
> I have very little patience for this situation.
I'll be happy to dive in and look at the changes from an mm point of view,
but I don't feel qualified to comment on all the file system
considerations.
Perhaps if someone from the fs side would volunteer; I know well how
frustrating it can be to be trapped in code review suspended animation.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists