linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 20/37] ARM: davinci: aintc: move timer-specific irq_set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMRc=Md+SPxKvHPz63SW84eSVopTesQ-MhX_yeQZ1OEserptLA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 14 Feb 2019 13:56:06 +0100
From:   Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To:     Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>
Cc:     Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 20/37] ARM: davinci: aintc: move timer-specific
 irq_set_handler() out of irq.c

czw., 14 lut 2019 o 13:44 Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com> napisał(a):
>
> On 14/02/19 4:27 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 10:38:18 +0000,
> > Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl> wrote:
> >>
> >> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
> >>
> >> I've been unable to figure out exactly why, but it seems that the
> >> IRQ_TINT1_TINT34 interrupt for timer 1 needs to be handled as a
> >> level irq, not edge like all others.
> >>
> >> Let's move the handler setup out of the aintc driver where it's lived
> >> since the beginning and into the dm* SoC-specific files where it
> >> belongs.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
> >> ---
> >>  arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm355.c  | 8 ++++++++
> >>  arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm365.c  | 8 ++++++++
> >>  arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm644x.c | 8 ++++++++
> >>  arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm646x.c | 8 ++++++++
> >>  arch/arm/mach-davinci/irq.c    | 3 ---
> >>  5 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm355.c b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm355.c
> >> index c7cd765114af..a732f2ea1d9a 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm355.c
> >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm355.c
> >> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
> >>  #include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
> >>  #include <linux/dmaengine.h>
> >>  #include <linux/init.h>
> >> +#include <linux/irq.h>
> >>  #include <linux/irqchip/irq-davinci-aintc.h>
> >>  #include <linux/platform_data/edma.h>
> >>  #include <linux/platform_data/gpio-davinci.h>
> >> @@ -744,6 +745,13 @@ void __init dm355_init_time(void)
> >>      psc = ioremap(DAVINCI_PWR_SLEEP_CNTRL_BASE, SZ_4K);
> >>      dm355_psc_init(NULL, psc);
> >>
> >> +    /*
> >> +     * Nobody knows why anymore, but this interrupt has been handled as
> >> +     * a level irq from the very beginning of davinci support in mainline
> >> +     * linux.
> >> +     */
> >> +    irq_set_handler(DAVINCI_INTC_IRQ(IRQ_TINT1_TINT34), handle_level_irq);
> >> +
> >
> > I've said it on v2, I'm repeating it on v3. There is no point in
> > duplicating this pointless hack on and on again. If there is a driver
> > using this interrupt, move the setup there, and fix the irq_set_type
> > callback.
> >
> > If nothing is using it, remove it altogether.
>
> Alright, fine with me as well. Dropping the hack is fine. And I think
> that just boils down to discarding this patch.
>

Actually this patch should simply remove the call to irq_set_handler()
from the driver.

Bart