[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190214145153.oeqlocjwqeaedlvq@linutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 15:51:53 +0100
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/22] x86/fpu: Add (__)make_fpregs_active helpers
On 2019-02-13 10:30:25 [+0100], Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 11:43:25AM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > They are accessible inside the region. But they should not be touched by
> > context switch code (and later BH).
> > Is that what you meant?
>
> I just don't like that "changes" name. So when called, those functions
> practically lock the FPU regs from being accessed by others. So with
>
> fpregs_lock
> fpregs_unlock
>
> for example, is kinda clear what's going on and you don't have to wonder
> what it does.
renamed as suggested.
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists