lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 15:33:12 +0000 From: Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com> To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> CC: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, Leo Li <leoyang.li@....com>, "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, Alexandru Marginean <alexandru.marginean@....com>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org> Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next 2/3] arm64: dts: fsl: ls1028a-rdb: Add ENETC external eth ports for the LS1028A RDB board >-----Original Message----- >From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> >Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2019 8:16 PM >To: Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com> >Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>; Leo Li <leoyang.li@....com>; David S . >Miller <davem@...emloft.net>; devicetree@...r.kernel.org; Alexandru >Marginean <alexandru.marginean@....com>; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; >linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org; netdev@...r.kernel.org >Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3] arm64: dts: fsl: ls1028a-rdb: Add ENETC >external eth ports for the LS1028A RDB board > >On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 01:02:22PM +0200, Claudiu Manoil wrote: >> The LS1028A RDB board features an Atheros PHY connected over SGMII to >> the ENETC PF0 (or Port0). ENETC Port1 (PF1) has no external >> connection on this board, so it can be disabled for now. >> >> Signed-off-by: Alex Marginean <alexandru.marginean@....com> >> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com> >> --- >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a-rdb.dts | 15 >> +++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a-rdb.dts >> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a-rdb.dts >> index fdeb417..c8487893 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a-rdb.dts >> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a-rdb.dts >> @@ -71,3 +71,18 @@ >> &duart1 { >> status = "okay"; >> }; >> + >> +&enetc_port0 { >> + phy-handle = <&sgmii_phy0>; >> + phy-connection-type = "sgmii"; >> + #address-cells = <1>; >> + #size-cells = <0>; >> + >> + sgmii_phy0: ethernet-phy@2 { >> + reg = <0x2>; >> + }; >> +}; >> + > >Hi Claudiu > >It is better to use: > >&enetc_port0 { > phy-handle = <&sgmii_phy0>; > phy-connection-type = "sgmii"; > #address-cells = <1>; > #size-cells = <0>; > > mdio { > sgmii_phy0: ethernet-phy@2 { > reg = <0x2>; > }; > }; >}; Hi Andrew, The extra node for mdio seems to complicate things somewhat. Just adding this node seems not enough. How to find out easily if a child of a enetc port node is a mdio node? I was thinking to use device_type for that, like this: &enetc_port0 { phy-handle = <&sgmii_phy0>; phy-connection-type = "sgmii"; mdio { #address-cells = <1>; #size-cells = <0>; device_type = "mdio"; sgmii_phy0: ethernet-phy@2 { reg = <0x2>; }; }; }; Would you agree with this? Thanks, Claudiu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists