linux-kernel - [PATCH v3] x86/ima: require signed kernel modules

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1550249418-7986-1-git-send-email-zohar@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Fri, 15 Feb 2019 11:50:18 -0500
From:   Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>,
        Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
        David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@...onical.com>,
        "Bruno E . O . Meneguele" <bmeneg@...hat.com>,
        Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3] x86/ima: require signed kernel modules

Have the IMA architecture specific policy require signed kernel modules
on systems with secure boot mode enabled; and coordinate the different
signature verification methods, so only one signature is required.

Requiring appended kernel module signatures may be configured, enabled
on the boot command line, or with this patch enabled in secure boot
mode.  This patch defines set_module_sig_enforced().

To coordinate between appended kernel module signatures and IMA
signatures, only define an IMA MODULE_CHECK policy rule if
CONFIG_MODULE_SIG is not enabled.  A custom IMA policy may still define
and require an IMA signature.

Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/ima_arch.c | 9 ++++++++-
 include/linux/module.h     | 5 +++++
 kernel/module.c            | 5 +++++
 3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/ima_arch.c b/arch/x86/kernel/ima_arch.c
index e47cd9390ab4..3fb9847f1cad 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/ima_arch.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/ima_arch.c
@@ -64,12 +64,19 @@ static const char * const sb_arch_rules[] = {
 	"appraise func=KEXEC_KERNEL_CHECK appraise_type=imasig",
 #endif /* CONFIG_KEXEC_VERIFY_SIG */
 	"measure func=KEXEC_KERNEL_CHECK",
+#if !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MODULE_SIG)
+	"appraise func=MODULE_CHECK appraise_type=imasig",
+#endif
+	"measure func=MODULE_CHECK",
 	NULL
 };
 
 const char * const *arch_get_ima_policy(void)
 {
-	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IMA_ARCH_POLICY) && arch_ima_get_secureboot())
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IMA_ARCH_POLICY) && arch_ima_get_secureboot()) {
+		if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MODULE_SIG))
+			set_module_sig_enforced();
 		return sb_arch_rules;
+	}
 	return NULL;
 }
diff --git a/include/linux/module.h b/include/linux/module.h
index 8fa38d3e7538..5aaa9359adc8 100644
--- a/include/linux/module.h
+++ b/include/linux/module.h
@@ -660,6 +660,7 @@ static inline bool is_livepatch_module(struct module *mod)
 #endif /* CONFIG_LIVEPATCH */
 
 bool is_module_sig_enforced(void);
+void set_module_sig_enforced(void);
 
 #else /* !CONFIG_MODULES... */
 
@@ -780,6 +781,10 @@ static inline bool is_module_sig_enforced(void)
 	return false;
 }
 
+static inline void set_module_sig_enforced(void)
+{
+}
+
 /* Dereference module function descriptor */
 static inline
 void *dereference_module_function_descriptor(struct module *mod, void *ptr)
diff --git a/kernel/module.c b/kernel/module.c
index 2ad1b5239910..73cada04bd24 100644
--- a/kernel/module.c
+++ b/kernel/module.c
@@ -286,6 +286,11 @@ bool is_module_sig_enforced(void)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(is_module_sig_enforced);
 
+void set_module_sig_enforced(void)
+{
+	sig_enforce = true;
+}
+
 /* Block module loading/unloading? */
 int modules_disabled = 0;
 core_param(nomodule, modules_disabled, bint, 0);
-- 
2.7.5