[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190215181223.GA8393@krava>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2019 19:12:23 +0100
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10] perf tools: Add perf_topo_cpu object
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 06:19:35PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 01:32:45PM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > Making struct cpu_topo global and renaming it to
> > struct perf_topo_cpu, so it can be used from record
> > command in following patches.
> >
> > Adding following interface functions to load/free
> > cpu topology details:
> > struct perf_topo_cpu *perf_topo_cpu__new(void);
> > void perf_topo_cpu__free(struct perf_topo_cpu *tp);
> >
> > Moving it into separate object file cputopo.c together
> > with numa related object in following patches.
> >
> > No functional change, the new interface will be used
> > in upcoming changes.
>
> Please rename it to 'struct cpu_topology' and make its related functions
> be cpu_topology__new, the __free() should be __delete() since it doesn't
> just free its members, but deletes itself as well.
>
> I think this is not perf specific at all, so no need for the 'perf'
> prefix.
ok, will do
jirka
Powered by blists - more mailing lists