linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/9] [RFC] vfio: ap: ioctl definitions for AP Queue Interrupt Control

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <0aae8b92-fc8c-a2c1-ad44-a63f26a9372e@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Fri, 15 Feb 2019 09:44:07 +0100
From:   Pierre Morel <pmorel@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com>, borntraeger@...ibm.com
Cc:     alex.williamson@...hat.com, cohuck@...hat.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, frankja@...ux.ibm.com, pasic@...ux.ibm.com,
        david@...hat.com, schwidefsky@...ibm.com,
        heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, freude@...ux.ibm.com, mimu@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/9] [RFC] vfio: ap: ioctl definitions for AP Queue
 Interrupt Control

On 14/02/2019 21:33, Tony Krowiak wrote:
> On 2/14/19 8:51 AM, Pierre Morel wrote:
> 
> The subject leads one to believe this patch series introduces
> ioctl definitions for AQIC, but there is not a single ioctl
> definition in the series. Something like this might be more
> appropriate:

This is right Tony, no ioctl here.
I kept the original subject and increment the version number to let 
people know that this is a new version of the implementation of 
PQAP/AQIC interception for which we already had 2 iterations.

May be you are right and I should have change the subject.

Thanks for making this clear.

Regards,
Pierre

-- 
Pierre Morel
Linux/KVM/QEMU in Böblingen - Germany