linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] i2c: mediatek: modify threshold passed to i2c_get_dma_safe_msg

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJMQK-jrpnfzKNYh01Pg6QydSSa-=6x44Pj1wwMdXw7G3x-ybA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 15 Feb 2019 17:17:27 +0800
From:   Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@...omium.org>
To:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Jun Gao <jun.gao@...iatek.com>,
        Ryder Lee <ryder.lee@...iatek.com>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: mediatek: modify threshold passed to i2c_get_dma_safe_msg_buf()

Ok, I can add a check in another patch. Should we return NULL pointer
if msg->len is 0 or print out some warnings? Thanks.

On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 5:10 PM Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 05:02:02PM +0800, Hsin-Yi Wang wrote:
> > i2c_get_dma_safe_msg_buf() allocates space based on msg->len. If threshold is
> > 0 and msg->len is also 0, function makes zero-length allocation, which returns
> > a special ZERO_SIZE_PTR instead of a NULL pointer, and this will cause later
> > code to fail. Modify the threshold to > 0 so the function returns NULL pointer.
> >
> > Fixes: fc66b39fe36a ("i2c: mediatek: Use DMA safe buffers for i2c transactions")
> > Signed-off-by: Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@...omium.org>
>
> Right. But we need to fix i2c_get_dma_safe_msg_buf(), so it will be
> handled for all callers. Do you want to add a check if msg->len is 0 or
> shall I? Both fine for me.
>