[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <388add9e-8643-b08f-2eec-9742c5411cc0@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2019 17:31:13 +0800
From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
CC: Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>, <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
<linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <weidu.du@...wei.com>,
Miao Xie <miaoxie@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] staging: erofs: complete POSIX ACL support
On 2019/2/15 15:36, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 10:10:34AM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
>> Hi Dan,
>>
>> Any suggestion?
>>
>
> I won't NAK whatever you decide. But my opinion is that you should
> just use normal kernel memory allocators even though it means you have
> to use two different fault injection frameworks.
Thanks for the suggestion.
There is only one injection type in erofs injection framework, I don't want
to remove all framework codes with kmalloc type, so I think we can do this
step by step:
a. use erofs_kamloc to keep all codes consistent.
b. add at least one erofs private injection type.
c. remove erofs_kmalloc and related type.
>
> Over time it would be good to improve and expand the standard kernel
> error injection frameworks to cover more types.
Agreed.
Thanks,
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists