lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 15 Feb 2019 09:52:21 +0000
From:   Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
To:     Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
Cc:     Gustavo Pimentel <gustavo.pimentel@...opsys.com>,
        Alan Douglas <adouglas@...ence.com>,
        Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>,
        Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/15] PCI: endpoint: Fix pci_epf_alloc_space to set
 correct MEM TYPE flags

On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 11:49:12AM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> Hi Lorenzo,
> 
> On 14/02/19 9:59 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 07:17:14PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> >> Hi Lorenzo,
> >>
> >> On 11/02/19 11:07 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 04:45:06PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> >>>> pci_epf_alloc_space() sets the MEM TYPE flags to indicate a 32-bit
> >>>> Base Address Register irrespective of the size. Fix it here to indicate
> >>>> 64-bit BAR if the size is > 2GB.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
> >>>> ---
> >>>>  drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epf-core.c | 4 +++-
> >>>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>
> >>> This looks like a fix and should me marked as such. Does it work
> >>> as as standalone patch if it gets backported ?
> >>
> >> Yeah, it should work. But the current users doesn't allocate > 2GB and some
> >> EPC drivers configure their registers based on size. So nothing is broken
> >> without this patch as such.
> > 
> > I suspect you mean 4GB (here and the commit log), right ? I am checking
> > the commit logs, aiming at merging the patches.
> 
> A 32bit BAR register can support a 'size' of only up to 2GB. Though it
> can hold a memory address of up to 4GB.
> 
> This is also mentioned in the PCI Local Bus Specification.  "A 32-bit
> register can be implemented to support a single memory size that is a
> power of 2 from 16 bytes to 2 GB"

Very true - sorry for the noise.

Lorenz,o

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ