[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190215111324.30129-12-ming.lei@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2019 19:13:17 +0800
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Omar Sandoval <osandov@...com>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>,
Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...il.com>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>, dm-devel@...hat.com,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org,
David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
"Darrick J . Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@...wei.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
Coly Li <colyli@...e.de>, linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org,
Boaz Harrosh <ooo@...ctrozaur.com>,
Bob Peterson <rpeterso@...hat.com>, cluster-devel@...hat.com,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH V15 11/18] block: loop: pass multi-page bvec to iov_iter
iov_iter is implemented on bvec itererator helpers, so it is safe to pass
multi-page bvec to it, and this way is much more efficient than passing one
page in each bvec.
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Reviewed-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@...com>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
---
drivers/block/loop.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/loop.c b/drivers/block/loop.c
index cf5538942834..8ef583197414 100644
--- a/drivers/block/loop.c
+++ b/drivers/block/loop.c
@@ -511,21 +511,22 @@ static int lo_rw_aio(struct loop_device *lo, struct loop_cmd *cmd,
loff_t pos, bool rw)
{
struct iov_iter iter;
+ struct req_iterator rq_iter;
struct bio_vec *bvec;
struct request *rq = blk_mq_rq_from_pdu(cmd);
struct bio *bio = rq->bio;
struct file *file = lo->lo_backing_file;
+ struct bio_vec tmp;
unsigned int offset;
- int segments = 0;
+ int nr_bvec = 0;
int ret;
+ rq_for_each_bvec(tmp, rq, rq_iter)
+ nr_bvec++;
+
if (rq->bio != rq->biotail) {
- struct req_iterator iter;
- struct bio_vec tmp;
- __rq_for_each_bio(bio, rq)
- segments += bio_segments(bio);
- bvec = kmalloc_array(segments, sizeof(struct bio_vec),
+ bvec = kmalloc_array(nr_bvec, sizeof(struct bio_vec),
GFP_NOIO);
if (!bvec)
return -EIO;
@@ -534,10 +535,10 @@ static int lo_rw_aio(struct loop_device *lo, struct loop_cmd *cmd,
/*
* The bios of the request may be started from the middle of
* the 'bvec' because of bio splitting, so we can't directly
- * copy bio->bi_iov_vec to new bvec. The rq_for_each_segment
+ * copy bio->bi_iov_vec to new bvec. The rq_for_each_bvec
* API will take care of all details for us.
*/
- rq_for_each_segment(tmp, rq, iter) {
+ rq_for_each_bvec(tmp, rq, rq_iter) {
*bvec = tmp;
bvec++;
}
@@ -551,11 +552,10 @@ static int lo_rw_aio(struct loop_device *lo, struct loop_cmd *cmd,
*/
offset = bio->bi_iter.bi_bvec_done;
bvec = __bvec_iter_bvec(bio->bi_io_vec, bio->bi_iter);
- segments = bio_segments(bio);
}
atomic_set(&cmd->ref, 2);
- iov_iter_bvec(&iter, rw, bvec, segments, blk_rq_bytes(rq));
+ iov_iter_bvec(&iter, rw, bvec, nr_bvec, blk_rq_bytes(rq));
iter.iov_offset = offset;
cmd->iocb.ki_pos = pos;
--
2.9.5
Powered by blists - more mailing lists