linux-kernel - [PATCH v1 1/1] perf: Optimistically use high order allocations for AUX buffers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190215114727.62648-2-alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 15 Feb 2019 13:47:27 +0200
From:   Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc:     Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        jolsa@...hat.com,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 1/1] perf: Optimistically use high order allocations for AUX buffers

Currently, the AUX buffer allocator will use high-order allocations
for PMUs that don't support hardware scatter-gather chaining to ensure
large contiguous blocks of pages, and always use an array of single
pages otherwise.

There is, however, a tangible performance benefit in using larger chunks
of contiguous memory even in the latter case, that comes from not having
to fetch the next page's address at every page boundary. In particular,
a task running under Intel PT on an Atom CPU shows 1.5%-2% less runtime
penalty with a single multi-page output region in snapshot mode (no PMI)
than with multiple single-page output regions, from ~6% down to ~4%. For
the snapshot mode it does make a difference as it is intended to run over
long periods of time.

For this reason, change the allocation policy to always optimistically
start with the highest possible order when allocating pages for the AUX
buffer, desceding until the allocation succeeds or order zero allocation
fails.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
---
 kernel/events/ring_buffer.c | 32 +++++++++++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/events/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/events/ring_buffer.c
index 70ae2422cbaf..cc395475e0dd 100644
--- a/kernel/events/ring_buffer.c
+++ b/kernel/events/ring_buffer.c
@@ -598,29 +598,27 @@ int rb_alloc_aux(struct ring_buffer *rb, struct perf_event *event,
 {
 	bool overwrite = !(flags & RING_BUFFER_WRITABLE);
 	int node = (event->cpu == -1) ? -1 : cpu_to_node(event->cpu);
-	int ret = -ENOMEM, max_order = 0;
+	int ret = -ENOMEM, max_order;

 	if (!has_aux(event))
 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;

-	if (event->pmu->capabilities & PERF_PMU_CAP_AUX_NO_SG) {
-		/*
-		 * We need to start with the max_order that fits in nr_pages,
-		 * not the other way around, hence ilog2() and not get_order.
-		 */
-		max_order = ilog2(nr_pages);
+	/*
+	 * We need to start with the max_order that fits in nr_pages,
+	 * not the other way around, hence ilog2() and not get_order.
+	 */
+	max_order = ilog2(nr_pages);

-		/*
-		 * PMU requests more than one contiguous chunks of memory
-		 * for SW double buffering
-		 */
-		if ((event->pmu->capabilities & PERF_PMU_CAP_AUX_SW_DOUBLEBUF) &&
-		    !overwrite) {
-			if (!max_order)
-				return -EINVAL;
+	/*
+	 * PMU requests more than one contiguous chunks of memory
+	 * for SW double buffering
+	 */
+	if ((event->pmu->capabilities & PERF_PMU_CAP_AUX_SW_DOUBLEBUF) &&
+	    !overwrite) {
+		if (!max_order)
+			return -EINVAL;

-			max_order--;
-		}
+		max_order--;
 	}

 	rb->aux_pages = kcalloc_node(nr_pages, sizeof(void *), GFP_KERNEL,
-- 
2.20.1