lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190215144559.8777-1-hch@lst.de>
Date:   Fri, 15 Feb 2019 15:45:54 +0100
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Helge Deller <deller@....de>
Cc:     Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: allow larger than require DMA masks

Hi all,

this series finishes off converting our dma mask model to split between
device capabilities (dev->dma_mask and dev->coherent_dma_mask) and system
limitations (dev->bus_dma_mask).  We already accept larger than required
masks in most dma_map_ops implementation, in case of x86 and
implementations based on it since the dawn of time.  Only one parisc
and two sparc64 instances failed larger than required DMA masks, and
this series fixes that up and updates the documentation that devices
don't need to handle DMA mask fallbacks.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ