linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 00/37] ARM: davinci: modernize the irq support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:44:42 +0530
From:   Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>
To:     Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
        Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
        David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>
CC:     <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/37] ARM: davinci: modernize the irq support

Marc,

On 14/02/19 8:21 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
> 
> This series ports the davinci platform to using SPARSE_IRQ, cleans up
> the irqchip drivers and moves them over to drivers/irqchip.
> 
> The series can be logically split into five parts. The first patch
> preemptively fixes a problem in an input driver that would have caused
> problems later. Patches (2-9) aim at introducing support for SPARSE_IRQ.
> They contain a couple changes required for that functionality and do some
> cleanup at the end.
> 
> Third part (10-22) makes the aintc driver suitable for drivers/irqchip
> and eventually moves it over there.
> 
> Part 4 (23-36) does the same for the cp-intc driver.
> 
> Last patch removes unnecessary code.
> 
> The series has been tested on da850-lcdk (for cp-intc) and
> dm365-evm (for aintc).

Do you have any further comments? If no, I would like to apply for v5.1
with your ack.

Thanks,
Sekhar