[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <83ed0bf4-9833-8bf2-41ff-638035e71bd3@embeddedor.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2019 10:02:16 -0600
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@...hat.com>, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/nouveau/bo: mark expected switch fall-through
Hi,
Please drop this, as I have included this fix into
the following patch, which addresses all the
expected fall-throughs in drivers/gpu/drm:
https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1042856/
Thanks
--
Gustavo
On 2/11/19 12:58 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch
> cases where we are expecting to fall through.
>
> This patch fixes the following warning:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c: In function ‘nouveau_ttm_io_mem_reserve’:
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c:1434:53: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
> if (drm->client.mem->oclass < NVIF_CLASS_MEM_NV50 || !mem->kind)
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c:1438:2: note: here
> case TTM_PL_VRAM:
> ^~~~
>
> Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3
>
> Notice that, in this particular case, the code comment is modified
> in accordance with what GCC is expecting to find.
>
> This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enable
> -Wimplicit-fallthrough.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
> index 73eff52036d2..a72be71c45b4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
> @@ -1434,7 +1434,7 @@ nouveau_ttm_io_mem_reserve(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev, struct ttm_mem_reg *reg)
> if (drm->client.mem->oclass < NVIF_CLASS_MEM_NV50 || !mem->kind)
> /* untiled */
> break;
> - /* fallthrough, tiled memory */
> + /* fall through - tiled memory */
> case TTM_PL_VRAM:
> reg->bus.offset = reg->start << PAGE_SHIFT;
> reg->bus.base = device->func->resource_addr(device, 1);
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists