linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] ARM errata 814220

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 15 Feb 2019 17:30:44 +0100
From:   Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@...aro.org>
CC:     Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] ARM errata 814220



On 2/13/19 3:52 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 10:56 AM Benjamin Gaignard
> <benjamin.gaignard@...aro.org> wrote:
>>
>> Implement ARM errata 814220 for Cortex A7.
>>
>> This patch has been wroten by Jason Liu years ago but never send upstream.
>> I have tried to contact the author on multiple email addresses but I haven't
>> found any valid one...
>> I have keep Jason's sign-off and just rebase the patch on to v5-rc6.
>>
>> Benjamin Gaignard (2):
>>    ARM: errata 814220-B-Cache maintenance by set/way operations can
>>      execute out of order.
>>    ARM: stm32: select ARM errata 814220
>>
>>   arch/arm/Kconfig            | 10 ++++++++++
>>   arch/arm/mach-stm32/Kconfig |  1 +
>>   arch/arm/mm/cache-v7.S      |  3 +++
>>   3 files changed, 14 insertions(+)
> 
> Looks good to me,
> 
> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> 
> It probably makes most sense to keep them as a series, either
> through the soc tree or Russell's patch tracker, so feel free to add
> it there, and have them both in the stm32 soc branch for arm-soc
> if Russell prefers.

Russel, what do you think about Arnd proposition? I could take both
patches in my stm32 tree. It'll make part of future v5.2 pull request.

Alex


> 
> As we have a number of Cortex-A7 based platforms with all
> kinds of revisions, I wonder if we should also select the workaround
> for the others. I can probably figure out which SoC platforms
> are based on Cortex-A7, but I have no idea about the revisions,
> so that might mean we'd have to do it for all of them. According
> to the latest TRM I found, only revisions r0p0 through r0p5
> exist, and the erraturm text lists r0p2 through r0p5, which may
> mean all products ever shipped in practice (the oldest public
> TRM from 2012 already describe r0p3).
> 
> 
> 
> 
>       Arnd
>