[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8ba4643b-496e-597f-32e1-c14b8e46880c@web.de>
Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2019 10:20:41 +0100
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Cc: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
Wen Yang <wen.yang99@....com.cn>,
Yi Wang <wang.yi59@....com.cn>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
Wen Yang <yellowriver2010@...mail.com>,
Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@...g.fr>,
Cheng Shengyu <cheng.shengyu@....com.cn>,
cocci@...teme.lip6.fr, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Cocci] [v5] coccinelle: semantic code search for
missingput_device()
>>> We don't need perfection.
>>
>> I guess that you noticed in the meantime that I dare to propose
>> more software development efforts in such a direction.
>
> Yes, this is noticable.
I am curious then if remaining change suggestions will be picked up
by more software developers and reviewers.
> It is your choice, however, other people may have their reasons
> for other choices...
Yes, of course.
>>> We need more to eliminate the memory leaks.
>
> ... like this one.
>
>> Will this view evolve into further helpful and constructive clarifications?
>
> Given my above, what is the evaluation of the same question to yourself?
* I hope that my contributions can improve the situation also
for this software area.
* Existing development tools will evolve further as usual.
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists