[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190215212133.7d33444f@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2019 21:21:33 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
Changbin Du <changbin.du@...il.com>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] kprobe: Do not use uaccess functions to access
kernel memory that can fault
On Fri, 15 Feb 2019 18:14:21 -0800
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> wrote:
> > In the uprobes case, we have:
> >
> > static nokprobe_inline int
> > probe_mem_read(void *dest, void *src, size_t size)
> > {
> > void __user *vaddr = (void __force __user *)src;
> >
> > return copy_from_user(dest, vaddr, size) ? -EFAULT : 0;
> > }
> >
> > Because that is adding probes on userspace code.
> >
> >
>
> Can the kprobe case call probe_kernel_read? Maybe it does already?
Yes, the probe_mem_read() is only used in the trace_probe_tmpl.h which
for uprobes is the above "copy_from_user()" and for the kprobes case it
is probe_kernel_read().
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists