linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] of: unittest: unflatten device tree on UML when testing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 15 Feb 2019 18:35:40 -0800
From:   Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>
To:     Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        mcgrof@...nel.org
Cc:     devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] of: unittest: unflatten device tree on UML when
 testing

On 2/15/19 6:18 PM, Frank Rowand wrote:
> On 2/15/19 4:46 PM, Brendan Higgins wrote:
>> UML supports enabling OF, and is useful for running the device tree
>> tests, so add support for unflattening device tree blobs so we can
>> actually use it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/of/unittest.c | 3 +++
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/of/unittest.c b/drivers/of/unittest.c
>> index 84427384654d5..6de34d5fa0e85 100644
>> --- a/drivers/of/unittest.c
>> +++ b/drivers/of/unittest.c
>> @@ -2527,6 +2527,9 @@ static int __init of_unittest(void)
>>  	}
>>  	of_node_put(np);
>>  
>> +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_UML))
>> +		unittest_unflatten_overlay_base();
>> +
> 
> This is still the wrong location.  It should be at the top of the function.
> 
> I'll try moving it to the top and see if it still works -- should only
> take me a few minutes.

Yep, see below.


> -Frank
> 
>>  	pr_info("start of unittest - you will see error messages\n");
>>  	of_unittest_check_tree_linkage();
>>  	of_unittest_check_phandles();
>>
> 
> 

This is probably white space damaged because I used cut and paste,
but this is what I meant above.

Tested on 5.0-rc3.

Applied patches 1-14 of series:

   [RFC v4 00/17] kunit: introduce KUnit, the Linux kernel unit testing framework

booted uml, saw the expected 219 pass, 1 fail.

Applied the following patch, saw the expected 224 pass, 0 fail.

I did not apply patch 15 of the other series, but applying patch 15
should still result in errors on boot, as I reported in the mail
thread for that patch series.

---
 drivers/of/unittest.c |    4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

Index: b/drivers/of/unittest.c
===================================================================
--- a/drivers/of/unittest.c
+++ b/drivers/of/unittest.c
@@ -2514,6 +2514,10 @@ static int __init of_unittest(void)
 	int res;
 
 	/* adding data for unittest */
+
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_UML))
+		unittest_unflatten_overlay_base();
+
 	res = unittest_data_add();
 	if (res)
 		return res;