[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190216072127.GA1945@tigerII.localdomain>
Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2019 16:21:27 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
To: Yao HongBo <yaohongbo@...wei.com>
Cc: sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com, linuxarm@...wei.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: possible deadlock in console_unlock
On (02/16/19 14:36), Yao HongBo wrote:
> hi, sergey:
>
> As shown in that link, https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/6/6/397
>
> On the linux kernel 5.0-rc6, Syzkaller also hit 'possible deadlock in console_unlock'
> bug for several times in my environment.
>
> This solution fixes things for me. Do you have a plan to submit patches to
> solve this problem.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c b/drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c
> __printk_safe_enter();
> kmalloc(sizeof(struct tty_buffer) + 2 * size, GFP_ATOMIC);
> __printk_safe_exit();
I would probably try the following:
---
diff --git a/drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c b/drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c
index ec145a59f199..058d004dcbaa 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c
@@ -172,7 +172,8 @@ static struct tty_buffer *tty_buffer_alloc(struct tty_port *port, size_t size)
have queued and recycle that ? */
if (atomic_read(&port->buf.mem_used) > port->buf.mem_limit)
return NULL;
- p = kmalloc(sizeof(struct tty_buffer) + 2 * size, GFP_ATOMIC);
+ p = kmalloc(sizeof(struct tty_buffer) + 2 * size,
+ GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOWARN);
if (p == NULL)
return NULL;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists