linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] LSM: Ignore "security=" when "lsm=" is specified

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 17 Feb 2019 14:16:50 +0900
From:   Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
To:     SELinux <selinux@...r.kernel.org>, kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com
Cc:     Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] LSM: Ignore "security=" when "lsm=" is specified

On 2019/02/14 1:05, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> On 2/12/2019 10:23 AM, Kees Cook wrote:
>> To avoid potential confusion, explicitly ignore "security=" when "lsm=" is
>> used on the command line, and report that it is happening.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>
>> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> 
> Acked-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
> 

The manual for TOMOYO was updated to follow this change.
SELinux folks and AppArmor folks, can we apply this change?