[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190218142845.4ad56ec0@why.wild-wind.fr.eu.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 14:28:45 +0000
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
To: guoren@...nel.org
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, robh+dt@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Guo Ren <ren_guo@...ky.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 5/7] dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: Update csky
mpintc
On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 10:04:41 +0800
guoren@...nel.org wrote:
> From: Guo Ren <ren_guo@...ky.com>
>
> Add trigger type and priority setting for csky,mpintc.
>
> Changelog:
> - change #interrupt-cells to <3>
>
> Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <ren_guo@...ky.com>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
> ---
> .../bindings/interrupt-controller/csky,mpintc.txt | 21 +++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/csky,mpintc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/csky,mpintc.txt
> index ab921f1..dccd913 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/csky,mpintc.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/csky,mpintc.txt
> @@ -6,11 +6,18 @@ C-SKY Multi-processors Interrupt Controller is designed for ck807/ck810/ck860
> SMP soc, and it also could be used in non-SMP system.
>
> Interrupt number definition:
> -
> 0-15 : software irq, and we use 15 as our IPI_IRQ.
> 16-31 : private irq, and we use 16 as the co-processor timer.
> 31-1024: common irq for soc ip.
>
> +Interrupt triger mode:
> + IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH (default)
> + IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW
> + IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING
> + IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING
> +
> +Interrupt priority range: 0-255
> +
> =============================
> intc node bindings definition
> =============================
> @@ -26,15 +33,21 @@ intc node bindings definition
> - #interrupt-cells
> Usage: required
> Value type: <u32>
> - Definition: must be <1>
> + Definition: <3>
This seem to be invalidating all existing DTs. Is this an acceptable
thing to do? It will require an Ack from a DT maintainer.
> - interrupt-controller:
> Usage: required
>
> -Examples:
> +Examples: ("interrupts = <irq_num IRQ_TYPE_XXX priority>")
> ---------
>
> intc: interrupt-controller {
> compatible = "csky,mpintc";
> - #interrupt-cells = <1>;
> + #interrupt-cells = <3>;
> interrupt-controller;
> };
> +
> + device: device-example {
> + ...
> + interrupts = <34 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING 254>;
> + interrupt-parent = <&intc>;
> + };
Thanks,
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists