lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 18 Feb 2019 17:31:37 +0100
From:   Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To:     linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: [PATCH RT 2/2] x86: lazy-preempt: properly check against preempt-mask

should_resched() should check against preempt_offset after unmasking the
need-resched-bit. Otherwise should_resched() won't work for
preempt_offset != 0 and lazy-preempt set.

Cc: stable-rt@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h
index 22992c8377952..f667087792747 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h
@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ static __always_inline bool should_resched(int preempt_offset)
 
 	/* preempt count == 0 ? */
 	tmp &= ~PREEMPT_NEED_RESCHED;
-	if (tmp)
+	if (tmp != preempt_offset)
 		return false;
 	if (current_thread_info()->preempt_lazy_count)
 		return false;
-- 
2.20.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists