[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190218173514.123649591@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 17:56:24 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: mingo@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, pjt@...gle.com,
tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, subhra.mazumdar@...cle.com,
fweisbec@...il.com, keescook@...omium.org, kerrnel@...gle.com,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 04/16] sched/{rt,deadline}: Fix set_next_task vs pick_next_task
Because pick_next_task() implies set_curr_task() and some of the
details haven't matter too much, some of what _should_ be in
set_curr_task() ended up in pick_next_task, correct this.
This prepares the way for a pick_next_task() variant that does not
affect the current state; allowing remote picking.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
---
kernel/sched/deadline.c | 23 ++++++++++++-----------
kernel/sched/rt.c | 27 ++++++++++++++-------------
2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
@@ -1695,12 +1695,21 @@ static void start_hrtick_dl(struct rq *r
}
#endif
-static inline void set_next_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
+static void set_next_task_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
{
p->se.exec_start = rq_clock_task(rq);
/* You can't push away the running task */
dequeue_pushable_dl_task(rq, p);
+
+ if (hrtick_enabled(rq))
+ start_hrtick_dl(rq, p);
+
+ if (rq->curr->sched_class != &dl_sched_class)
+ update_dl_rq_load_avg(rq_clock_pelt(rq), rq, 0);
+
+ if (rq->curr != p)
+ deadline_queue_push_tasks(rq);
}
static struct sched_dl_entity *pick_next_dl_entity(struct rq *rq,
@@ -1759,15 +1768,7 @@ pick_next_task_dl(struct rq *rq, struct
p = dl_task_of(dl_se);
- set_next_task(rq, p);
-
- if (hrtick_enabled(rq))
- start_hrtick_dl(rq, p);
-
- deadline_queue_push_tasks(rq);
-
- if (rq->curr->sched_class != &dl_sched_class)
- update_dl_rq_load_avg(rq_clock_pelt(rq), rq, 0);
+ set_next_task_dl(rq, p);
return p;
}
@@ -1814,7 +1815,7 @@ static void task_fork_dl(struct task_str
static void set_curr_task_dl(struct rq *rq)
{
- set_next_task(rq, rq->curr);
+ set_next_task_dl(rq, rq->curr);
}
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
--- a/kernel/sched/rt.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/rt.c
@@ -1498,12 +1498,23 @@ static void check_preempt_curr_rt(struct
#endif
}
-static inline void set_next_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
+static inline void set_next_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
{
p->se.exec_start = rq_clock_task(rq);
/* The running task is never eligible for pushing */
dequeue_pushable_task(rq, p);
+
+ /*
+ * If prev task was rt, put_prev_task() has already updated the
+ * utilization. We only care of the case where we start to schedule a
+ * rt task
+ */
+ if (rq->curr->sched_class != &rt_sched_class)
+ update_rt_rq_load_avg(rq_clock_pelt(rq), rq, 0);
+
+ if (rq->curr != p)
+ rt_queue_push_tasks(rq);
}
static struct sched_rt_entity *pick_next_rt_entity(struct rq *rq,
@@ -1577,17 +1588,7 @@ pick_next_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct
p = _pick_next_task_rt(rq);
- set_next_task(rq, p);
-
- rt_queue_push_tasks(rq);
-
- /*
- * If prev task was rt, put_prev_task() has already updated the
- * utilization. We only care of the case where we start to schedule a
- * rt task
- */
- if (rq->curr->sched_class != &rt_sched_class)
- update_rt_rq_load_avg(rq_clock_pelt(rq), rq, 0);
+ set_next_task_rt(rq, p);
return p;
}
@@ -2356,7 +2357,7 @@ static void task_tick_rt(struct rq *rq,
static void set_curr_task_rt(struct rq *rq)
{
- set_next_task(rq, rq->curr);
+ set_next_task_rt(rq, rq->curr);
}
static unsigned int get_rr_interval_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *task)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists