[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1550511813-133136-1-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 01:43:33 +0800
From: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
To: <axboe@...nel.dk>
CC: <linuxarm@...wei.com>, <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH] ata: libahci: Only warn for AHCI_HFLAG_MULTI_MSI set when genuine custom irq handler implemented
For an AHCI controller with AHCI_HFLAG_MULTI_MSI flag set, we may get the
following log, regardless of whether a custom irq handler was implemented
or not:
[ 14.700238] ahci 0000:74:03.0: both AHCI_HFLAG_MULTI_MSI flag set and custom irq handler implemented
This is because we can set hpriv->irq_handler to
ahci_single_level_irq_intr() if not already set, in
ahci_init_one()->ahci_pci_save_initial_config()->ahci_save_initial_config().
Stop having this warn being misleading by adding a check for
hpriv->irq_handler != ahci_single_level_irq_intr.
Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
diff --git a/drivers/ata/libahci.c b/drivers/ata/libahci.c
index b5f57c69c487..692782dddc0f 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/libahci.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/libahci.c
@@ -2599,7 +2599,8 @@ int ahci_host_activate(struct ata_host *host, struct scsi_host_template *sht)
int rc;
if (hpriv->flags & AHCI_HFLAG_MULTI_MSI) {
- if (hpriv->irq_handler)
+ if (hpriv->irq_handler &&
+ hpriv->irq_handler != ahci_single_level_irq_intr)
dev_warn(host->dev,
"both AHCI_HFLAG_MULTI_MSI flag set and custom irq handler implemented\n");
if (!hpriv->get_irq_vector) {
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists