lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 18 Feb 2019 11:49:59 -0600
From:   "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To:     Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ath10k@...ts.infradead.org,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: -Wimplicit-fallthrough not working with ccache

Hi Kalle,

On 2/16/19 5:21 AM, Kalle Valo wrote:
> (replying to an old thread but renaming it)
> 
> Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org> writes:
> 
>> "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com> wrote:
>>
>>> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
>>> where we are expecting to fall through.
>>>
>>> Notice that in this particular case, I replaced "pass through" with
>>> a proper "fall through" comment, which is what GCC is expecting
>>> to find.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
>>
>> Patch applied to ath-next branch of ath.git, thanks.
>>
>> f1d270ae10ff ath10k: htt_tx: mark expected switch fall-throughs
> 
> Gustavo, I enabled W=1 on my ath10k build checks and it took me a while
> to figure out why GCC was warning about fall through annotations missing
> even I knew you had fixed them. Finally I figured out that the reason
> was ccache, which I need because I work with different branches and need
> to recompile the kernel quite often.
> 
> If the plan is to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough by default in the kernel
> IMHO this might become an issue, as otherwise people using ccache start
> seeing lots of invalid warnings. Apparently CCACHE_COMMENTS=1 will fix
> that but my version of ccache doesn't support it, and how would everyone
> learn that trick anyway? Or maybe CCACHE_COMMENTS can enabled through
> kernel Makefile?
> 

Can you share with me the warning messages you get?

I just see the following warnings with linux-next:

$ make CC="ccache gcc" W=1 drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_tx.o
  CC [M]  drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_tx.o
In file included from drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_tx.c:19:
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt.h:1727:1: warning: alignment 1 of ‘struct ath10k_htt_txbuf_32’ is less than 4 [-Wpacked-not-aligned]
 } __packed;
 ^
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt.h:1734:1: warning: alignment 1 of ‘struct ath10k_htt_txbuf_64’ is less than 4 [-Wpacked-not-aligned]
 } __packed;
 ^

In my Makefile I have:

KBUILD_CFLAGS  += $(call cc-option,-Wimplicit-fallthrough=3,)


Thanks
--
Gustavo

















Powered by blists - more mailing lists