lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 20:00:48 +0200 From: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@...il.com> To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>, "alsa-devel@...a-project.org" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>, "kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com" <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>, "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, "S.j. Wang" <shengjiu.wang@....com>, "lgirdwood@...il.com" <lgirdwood@...il.com>, "vicencb@...il.com" <vicencb@...il.com>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>, Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com> Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: simple-card: Fix refcount underflow On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 7:50 PM Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 08:52:26AM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > Daniel Baluta wrote: > > > > > Fixes: commit da215354eb55c ("ASoC: simple-card: merge simple-scu- > > > > card") > > > > Thanks! I thought about adding this but the current patch will not > > > cleanly apply because of: > > > > 2d01a84605a55c ("ASoC: simple-card: reduce naming prefix") > > That doesn't matter for fixes tags. However... > > > Yeah, it's a bit tricky because of the code change at this time. > > > At best, send two patches, once for 5.0 and once for 5.1, and let Mark > > apply both of them and do the empty merge from 5.0 to 5.1, or let him > > resolve the merge conflict by applying manually the 5.1 patch. > > ...since this is something that needs to be fixed for v5.0 we need a > patch that can be applied on v5.0 (and has been tested by someone who > sees the issue there). Takashi's plan seems like a good way to do that, > if you could send a patch against my for-5.0 branch (or just Linus' > tree) that'd be great. for-5.0 branch Kuninori's patch works fine: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10814255/ for-5.1 branch and later my patch works fine: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10817449/ Would you want me to change the patch for 5.0 to have an identical commit message as the one for 5.1?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists